Judiciary

NALSA v. UOI [AIR 2014 SC 1863]

NALSA v. UOI [AIR 2014 SC 1863] It legally acknowledged non-binary gender identifications and upheld transgender people’s fundamental rights in India. Bench – K.S Radhakrishnan and AK Sikri. Facts – The case involves legal gender acknowledgement of transgender people and whether the absence of legal initiatives to satisfy the requirements of people who do not …

NALSA v. UOI [AIR 2014 SC 1863] Read More »

PUCL v. UOI [AIR 2003 SC 2363]

PUCL v. UOI [AIR 2003 SC 2363] The Supreme Court reiterated its position, holding that voters have a right to obtain information regarding political candidates as per the provisions of Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution. Bench – K.G. Balakrishnan, P.Venkatarama Reddi. Facts – The People’s Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL) questioned the constitutionality of …

PUCL v. UOI [AIR 2003 SC 2363] Read More »

UOI v. Association for Democratic Reforms [2002 AIR 2112]

UOI v. Association for Democratic Reforms [2002 AIR 2112] The court addressed the notion that electors have a fundamental right to know the origins of candidates running for public office. The court interpreted the phrase “right to be informed” as a right derived from freedom of speech and expression. Bench – A D Singh, M …

UOI v. Association for Democratic Reforms [2002 AIR 2112] Read More »

I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu [AIR 2007 SC 861]

I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu [AIR 2007 SC 861] Any legislation that infringes on fundamental rights or violates the Basic Structure of the Constitution shall be subjected to judicial review and Schedule 9 does not save it from judicial scrutiny. Bench – Y.K Sabharwal Singh, Arijit Pasayat, S.H Kapadia, C.H Thakker, P.K Balasubramanyan, …

I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu [AIR 2007 SC 861] Read More »

Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan [AIR 1997 SC 3011]

Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan [AIR 1997 SC 3011] The Supreme Court issued the well-known Vishakha guidelines, requiring both the private and public industries to develop frameworks to address sexual harassment complaints. Bench – J.S. Verma, Sujata V. Manohar and B.N. Kirpal. Facts – Bhanwari Devi worked as a social worker in a programme launched …

Vishakha v. State of Rajasthan [AIR 1997 SC 3011] Read More »

Scroll to Top