CPC

Koppi Setty v. Ratnam v. Pamarti Venka 2007 RLR 27 (NSC)

Koppi Setty v. Ratnam v. Pamarti Venka 2007 RLR 27 (NSC) Appellant filed SLP in Supreme Court that High Court had no jurisdiction to set aside concurrent findings the Courts below U/S 100 of CPC and that also without formulating substantial question which is mandatorily required under the amended S. 100 of CPC. Provision was …

Koppi Setty v. Ratnam v. Pamarti Venka 2007 RLR 27 (NSC) Read More »

Chunnilal V. Mehta & Sons Ltd. v. Century Spn. & Mfg. Co. Ltd.AIR 1962 SC 1314

Chunnilal V. Mehta & Sons Ltd. v. Century Spn. & Mfg. Co. Ltd.AIR 1962 SC 1314  J.R. MUDHOLKAR, J. – This is an appeal by special leave against the judgment of the High Court of Bombay in an appeal from the judgment of a single judge of that Court. The claim in appeal before the …

Chunnilal V. Mehta & Sons Ltd. v. Century Spn. & Mfg. Co. Ltd.AIR 1962 SC 1314 Read More »

case summary

VEDANTA LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S. SESA STERLITE LTD.) VS. THE GOA FOUNDATION & ORS.

VEDANTA LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S. SESA STERLITE LTD.) VS. THE GOA FOUNDATION & ORS. [REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) DIARY NO. 18447 OF 2020] DR DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, J 9TH JULY 2021 LAW POINT- In accordance with Rule 2 of Order XLVII of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013, an application for review of a judgement has …

VEDANTA LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S. SESA STERLITE LTD.) VS. THE GOA FOUNDATION & ORS. Read More »

case summary

Atlanta Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Delta Marine Company & Ors.

Atlanta Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Delta Marine Company & Ors. [CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2876 OF 2021] SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. 19th JULY 2021 LAW POINT- A bank guarantee is an independent contact, there is a limited scope for interference, in case of encashment of bank guarantee as enunciated by various courts, including this Court from time …

Atlanta Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Delta Marine Company & Ors. Read More »

case summary

K.P. NATARAJAN & ANR. VS. MUTHALAMMAL & ORS. [SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 2492 OF 2021]

K.P. NATARAJAN & ANR. VS. MUTHALAMMAL & ORS. [SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 2492 OF 2021] V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J. 16TH JULY 2021 LAW POINT- The failure to appoint guardian ipso facto, will result in prejudice to the minor and it need not be specially established. FACTS  In a Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 …

K.P. NATARAJAN & ANR. VS. MUTHALAMMAL & ORS. [SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 2492 OF 2021] Read More »

FUMO CHEM PVT. LTD. VS. RAJ PROCESS EQUIPMENTS AND SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.

FUMO CHEM PVT. LTD. VS. RAJ PROCESS EQUIPMENTS AND SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. CORAM: JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE CITATION: CIVIL NO(S). 755/2021 FACTS: The proceeding before the Supreme Court arises out of a commercial dispute between the parties over supply of certain items (spray dryer). The respondents were meant to install the same in the petitioners’ manufacturing …

FUMO CHEM PVT. LTD. VS. RAJ PROCESS EQUIPMENTS AND SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. Read More »

case summary

COMPACK ENTERPRISES INDIA (P) LTD. VERSUS BEANT SINGH LL 2021 SC 93

COMPACK ENTERPRISES INDIA (P) LTD. VERSUS BEANT SINGH LL 2021 SC 93 JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED BY : Justices Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Vineet Saran JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON : 17.02.2021 LAW POINT : Compromise decree would not serve as an estoppel, where the compromise was vitiated by fraud, misrepresentation or mistake. FACTS : This case arose out …

COMPACK ENTERPRISES INDIA (P) LTD. VERSUS BEANT SINGH LL 2021 SC 93 Read More »

Scroll to Top