Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v. Boots Cash Chemist (Southern) Ltd. (1952) 2 All ER Rep. 456 LORD GODDARD, C. J. – This is a Special Case stated under R.S.C. Ord. 34, r. 1, and agreed between the parties and it turns on s. 18(1) of the Pharmacy and Poisons Act, 1933, which provides: ―Subject …
Harris v Nickerson (1872) LR 8 QB Facts The defendant was an auctioneer who had advertised in the London papers that certain brewing materials, plant, and office furniture would be sold by him by auction at Bury St. Edmunds over a period of three specified days. The plaintiff was a commission broker in London, who …
Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. [1891-4] All ER 127 On Nov. 13, 1891, the following advertisement was published by the defendants in the P‘all Mall Gazette: ―£ 100 reward will be paid by the Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. to any person who contracts the increasing epidemic influenza, colds, or any diseases caused by taking …
Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. [1891-4] All ER 127 Read More »
Brogden v Metropolitan Railway (1877) 2 App Cas 666 Facts The complainants, Brogden, were suppliers of coal to the defendant, Metropolitan Railway. They completed business dealings regarding the coal frequently for a number of years, on an informal basis. There was no written contract between the complainant and the defendant. However, the parties decided that …
Brogden v Metropolitan Railway (1877) 2 App Cas 666 Read More »
PADIA TIMBER COMPANY (P) LTD. VERSUS. VISAKHAPATNAM PORT TRUST JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON: 05.01.2021 JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED BY: Justices Navin Sinha and Indira Banerjee LAW POINT: when the acceptor puts in a new condition, while accepting the contract already signed by the proposer, the contract is not complete until the proposer accepts that condition. FACTS: On 17-7-1990, …
PADIA TIMBER COMPANY (P) LTD. VERSUS. VISAKHAPATNAM PORT TRUST Read More »
Venkata Chinnaya Rau v. Venkataramaya Garu (1881) 1 I.J. 137 (Mad.) INNES, J. – The plaintiffs’ sister, by deed of gift on the 9th April 1877, made over certain landed property to the defendant, her daughter. By the terms of the deed which was registered, it was stipulated that an annuity of 653 rupees should …
Venkata Chinnaya Rau v. Venkataramaya Garu (1881) 1 I.J. 137 (Mad.) Read More »
Abdul Aziz v. Masum Ali AIR 1914 All. 22 RICHARDS, C.J. – This appeal arises out of a suit brought by the plaintiffs against the heirs of Munshi Abdul Karim. The plaintiffs are the members of the Islam Local Agency Committee, Agra. It appears that in the year 1907, a movement was set on foot …
Doraiswami Iyer v. Arunachala Ayyar (1935) 43 L.W. 259 (Mad.) CORNISH, J. – This Civil Revision Petition arises out of a suit in which the trustees of a temple sought to recover a contribution promised by a subscriber to a subscription list for the repairs of a temple. It appears upon the fact found in …
Doraiswami Iyer v. Arunachala Ayyar (1935) 43 L.W. 259 (Mad.) Read More »
Kedarnath Bhattacharji v. Gorie Mahomed (1886) 7 I.D. 64 Cal. It appeared that it was thought advisable to erect a Town Hall at Howrah, provided sufficient subscriptions could be got together for the purpose. To this end the Commissioners of the Howrah Municipality set to work to obtain the necessary funds by public subscription, creating …
Kedarnath Bhattacharji v. Gorie Mahomed (1886) 7 I.D. 64 Cal. Read More »
Kanhaiya Lal Aggarwal v. Union of IndiaAIR 2002 SC 2766 S. RAJENDRA BABU, J. – The first respondent invited tenders for execution of five items of work including supply, delivery and stacking of 75,000 cubic metre machine crushed track ballast as per specifications at its depot in Naurozabad and loading it into Railway wagons. The …
Kanhaiya Lal Aggarwal v. Union of India AIR 2002 SC 2766 Read More »
