State of U.P. v. Nawab Hussain (AIR 1977 SC 1680 Section 11, Explanation IV- Constructive Res-judicata Facts: In this case, the petitioner was dismissed from service. He filed a writ petition on the ground of denial of opportunity of being heard and that the action taken against him was mala fide. After that dismissal of petition he filed …
State of U.P. v. Nawab Hussain (AIR 1977 SC 1680) Read More »
Iftikar Ahmed v. Syed Meharban Ali, AIR 1977 SC 749 Section 11 – Res judicata between Co-defendants. Facts: There was conflict of interest among co- plaintiffs. In the previous suit, Ishtaq Ahmed, K. Fatima, M. Ali (Co-plaintiffs) instituted a suit against the mortgagee, relating to shares of the latter two in mortgaged properties.in that suit it …
Iftikar Ahmed v. Syed Meharban Ali, (AIR 1977 SC 749) Read More »
Indian Bank v. Maharashtra State Co-operative Marketing Fed. Ltd. (AIR 1998 SC 1952) Facts: Bank filed Summary Suit in the Bombay High Court under Order 37 of the Code against the Federation for obtaining a decree for Rs. 4,96,59,160 alleging that the said amount has become recoverable under a Letter of Credit. The Bank took out …
(AIR 1979SC 653) (AIR 1979SC 653) Gundaji Satwaji Shinde v. Ramachandra Bhikaji Joshi (AIR 1979 SC 653) Facts: Plaintiff sued for specific performance of a contract for sale of agricultural land in the civil court and defendant appeared and raised a contention in Sec 63 of the Tenancy Act the plaintiff being not an agriculturist, he is …
Gundaji Satwaji Shinde v. Ramachandra Bhikaji Joshi (AIR 1979 SC 653) – CPC Read More »
Saloman v. Saloman & Co. Ltd. (1897) Facts: Saloman carried a business as leather merchant. He formed a limited company named Saloman and company with 6 of his family members in 20000 in fully paid up 1 Pound shares , 10000 in debentures and rest in cash to a total of 39000 Pounds. One year …
Saloman v. Saloman & Co. Ltd. (1897) – Company Law Read More »
K. RAMASWAMY, J. – Though the respondent was served on July 29, 1991, he neither appeared in person, nor through counsel. The facts set out in the complaint eloquently manifest on its face a clear abuse of the process of the court to harass the appellants. The respondent, an Advocate and Standing Counsel for the …
Punjab National Bank v. Surendra Prasad Sinha, AIR 1992 SC 1815 – Limitation Act Read More »
24. Prohibition of employment of children in factories, etc.—No child below the age of fourteen years shall be employed to work in any factory or mine or engaged in any other hazardous employment. Article 24 prohibits the employment of children below the age of fourteen in any factory or mine. The Employment of Children Act, …
24. Prohibition of employment of children in factories, etc.— Read More »
Right against Exploitation 23. Prohibition of traffic in human beings and forced labour.—(1) Traffic in human beings and begar and other similar forms of forced labour are prohibited and any contravention of this provision shall be an offence punishable in accordance with law. (2) Nothing in this article shall prevent the State from imposing compulsory …
23. Prohibition of traffic in human beings and forced labour. Read More »
21A. Right to education.—The State shall provide free and compulsory education to all children of the age of six to fourteen years in such manner as the State may, by law, determine. This was introduced by the Constitution (Eighty sixth Amendment) Act, 2002.
22. Protection against arrest and detention in certain cases.—(1) No person who is arrested shall be detained in custody without being informed, as soon as may be, of the grounds for such arrest nor shall he be denied the right to consult, and to be defended by, a legal practitioner of his choice. (2) Every …
22. Protection against arrest and detention in certain cases.— Read More »
