RATUL MAHANTA VS. NIRMALENDU SAHA A.S. BOPANNA, J (TWO JUDGE BENCH) [CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4627 OF 2021] AUGUST 10, 2021 LAW POINT- Despite there being the bar of jurisdiction of the civil courts under the Special Act, except for the disputes arising to the limited extent, all other issues are maintainable before the civil court. …
SRIHARI HANUMANDAS TOTALA VS. HEMANT VITHAL KAMAT & ORS. [CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4665 OF 2021] DR JUSTICE DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD AUGUST 9, 2021 LAW POINTS Whether a Suit is barred by law, must be determined from the statements in the plaint and not from Written Statement. Plea of Res Judicata is beyond the scope of …
SRIHARI HANUMANDAS TOTALA VS. HEMANT VITHAL KAMAT & ORS. Read More »
VEDANTA LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S. SESA STERLITE LTD.) VS. THE GOA FOUNDATION & ORS. [REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) DIARY NO. 18447 OF 2020] DR DHANANJAYA Y CHANDRACHUD, J 9TH JULY 2021 LAW POINT- In accordance with Rule 2 of Order XLVII of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013, an application for review of a judgement has …
VEDANTA LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S. SESA STERLITE LTD.) VS. THE GOA FOUNDATION & ORS. Read More »
Atlanta Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Delta Marine Company & Ors. [CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2876 OF 2021] SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J. 19th JULY 2021 LAW POINT- A bank guarantee is an independent contact, there is a limited scope for interference, in case of encashment of bank guarantee as enunciated by various courts, including this Court from time …
Atlanta Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. Delta Marine Company & Ors. Read More »
K.P. NATARAJAN & ANR. VS. MUTHALAMMAL & ORS. [SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 2492 OF 2021] V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J. 16TH JULY 2021 LAW POINT- The failure to appoint guardian ipso facto, will result in prejudice to the minor and it need not be specially established. FACTS In a Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 …
FUMO CHEM PVT. LTD. VS. RAJ PROCESS EQUIPMENTS AND SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. CORAM: JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE CITATION: CIVIL NO(S). 755/2021 FACTS: The proceeding before the Supreme Court arises out of a commercial dispute between the parties over supply of certain items (spray dryer). The respondents were meant to install the same in the petitioners’ manufacturing …
FUMO CHEM PVT. LTD. VS. RAJ PROCESS EQUIPMENTS AND SYSTEMS PVT. LTD. Read More »
COMPACK ENTERPRISES INDIA (P) LTD. VERSUS BEANT SINGH LL 2021 SC 93 JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED BY : Justices Mohan M. Shantanagoudar and Vineet Saran JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON : 17.02.2021 LAW POINT : Compromise decree would not serve as an estoppel, where the compromise was vitiated by fraud, misrepresentation or mistake. FACTS : This case arose out …
COMPACK ENTERPRISES INDIA (P) LTD. VERSUS BEANT SINGH LL 2021 SC 93 Read More »
Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra AIR 2003 SC 759 Case Summary Appeal before the Supreme Court by way of Special Leave Petition under Article-136 of the Constitution. Leave granted. Facts of the case: The defendants filed an application U/O-7, R-11, seeking dismissal of the plaint of the plaintiff on the grounds that it shows …
Saleem Bhai v. State of Maharashtra AIR 2003 SC 759 Read More »
Sangram Singh v. Election Tribunal, Kotah AIR 1955 SC 425 Case Summary Appeal before the Supreme Court by way of a certificate of fitness under Article-133(1)(c) of the Constitution by the High Court of Rajasthan. Facts of the case: One Bhurey Lal filed an election petition under Section 100 of the Representation of the People …
Sangram Singh v. Election Tribunal, Kotah AIR 1955 SC 425 Read More »
Rajni Kumar v. Suresh Kumar Malhotra, 2003 (3) SCALE 434 Case Summary Appeal before the Supreme Court by way of Special Leave Petition under Article-136 of the Constitution. Leave granted. The court discusses and contrasts Order 37, Rule 4 from Order 9, Rule 13. Facts of the case: This is a tenant landlord dispute. The …
Rajni Kumar v. Suresh Kumar Malhotra, 2003 (3) SCALE 434 Read More »
